<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Affable Curmudgeon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marvinrubinstein.com/blog/?feed=rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marvinrubinstein.com/blog</link>
	<description>Marv Rubinstein</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2010 04:37:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>OLD AGE AIN&#8217;T FOR WIMPS</title>
		<link>http://marvinrubinstein.com/blog/?p=194</link>
		<comments>http://marvinrubinstein.com/blog/?p=194#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2010 04:33:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marv</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marvinrubinstein.com/blog/?p=194</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My latest book, OLD AGE AIN’T FOR WIMPS, is just out. If you are of my generation, you may or may not like this book. But I do know that you will relate to it. For youngsters (anyone under 50), buy one and send it as a gift to Mom or Dad or grandparents. Available now [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My latest book, OLD AGE AIN’T FOR WIMPS, is just out. If you are of my generation, you may or may not like this book.  But I do know that you will relate to it. For youngsters (anyone under 50), buy one and send it as a gift to Mom or Dad or grandparents. Available now from  Amazon and (in a week or two) from bookstores.</p>
<p>IT MAY NOT BE A FUNNY SUBJECT, BUT IT’S A VERY FUNNY BOOK.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://marvinrubinstein.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=194</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BOTH SIDES NOW</title>
		<link>http://marvinrubinstein.com/blog/?p=190</link>
		<comments>http://marvinrubinstein.com/blog/?p=190#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 04:12:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marv</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marvinrubinstein.com/blog/?p=190</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am sick and tired of hearing or seeing in the media expressions such as : “Both sides do it.;” “Big industry donates to both Republicans and Democrats;” “All politicians lie.” “You’ll find voter fraud in both parties.” and numerous familiar claims. These are typical half truths, which are worst than outright lies.      [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>I am </strong>sick and tired of hearing or seeing in the media expressions such as : “Both sides do it.;” “Big industry donates to both Republicans and Democrats;” “All politicians lie.”  “You’ll find voter fraud in both parties.” and numerous familiar claims.  These are typical half truths, which are worst than outright lies.</p>
<p>       Of course, all these examples of iniquitous behavior can be found on both sides. But what do these statements mean&#8211;that each side is equally guilty, that 50 percent of special interest money, for example , goes to Republicans and Democrats alike? If 25 percent of Democrats lie and 70 percent of Republicans lie to their constituents, does that mean that politicians on both sides are equally untruthful?  Reverse the percentages, and the same question stares us in the face. Both sides do it.  Does that mean that we should not trust the honesty of all candidates?  Or should we weigh the relative dishonesty of both?</p>
<p>       Believe the glib claims from both sides of the aisle, and you will never know for whom to vote. It pays to doubt the veracity of those claiming equal culpability. Think of a parody of a once popular song. “ I’ve looked at candidates from both sides now, from in and out, and yet somehow, its their illusions I recall, I don’t really know candidates at all.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://marvinrubinstein.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=190</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>THE NOUVEAU ANTIS</title>
		<link>http://marvinrubinstein.com/blog/?p=188</link>
		<comments>http://marvinrubinstein.com/blog/?p=188#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Oct 2010 04:01:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marv</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marvinrubinstein.com/blog/?p=188</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[  Anti-Semitism and anti-black prejudice are no longer politically correct. The N-word and expressions such as kike and sheeny are seldom seen in print or heard on the media these days. However, racial and religious prejudice have taken on a new socially-acceptable guise. Obama and Israel are handy substitutes, fair game for expressing color or [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> </p>
<p><strong>Anti-Semitism</strong> and anti-black prejudice are no longer politically correct. The N-word and expressions such as kike and sheeny are seldom seen in print or heard on the media these days. However, racial and religious prejudice have taken on a new socially-acceptable guise. Obama and Israel are handy substitutes, fair game for expressing color or religious prejudice</p>
<p>          My friend Moe used to be a Democrat.  He now plans to vote Republican in upcoming elections. I ask if he approves of Obama’a health plan. “Yes, more or less.” Whether he favors paying unemployment insurance to the jobless for another year.  He admits that this would be the decent thing to do and might also help the economy, and he agrees that the banks and brokerage houses need some controls. But, he insists that we now need   a good Republican President, Tim Pawlenty for example. “But Moe,” I tell him, “Any Republican President is bound to bring into his administration people like Sarah Palin, Michelle Bachmann and Sharron Angle.” I quote several of their recent far-out pronouncements and ask, “Do you really want people with these viewpoints, obviously contrary to yours, running our Government?”</p>
<p>       No matter what I say, he remains obdurate.  I try unsuccessfully to find out what he really dislikes about Obama. He hems and haws, but the only answer I get is that he thinks that Obama doesn’t really love our Country. I didn’t pursue that for fear that his next statement might be  that he wants to see Obama’s birth certificate. His final comment: “I like the Democrats, but I don’t like Obama.” Wow!</p>
<p>       I brooded about our conversation all evening, and could only reach one conclusion. Although he would never admit it, consciously or subconsciously, Moe just doesn’t like or doesn’t trust African-Americans. A light went on in my head. Quite probably, many Americans, who would never publicly admit their prejudices and would hesitate to use anti-racial slurs, just find it easier to express disapproval of Barak Obama.  There is an old Yiddish expression about a mother scolding her daughter, using invective she would like to use, but hesitates to use, with her daughter-in-law.</p>
<p>       Thinking about it, I believe that many people in America and elsewhere aim their invective at Israel, when thy really have anti-Semitic feelings. Notice that, when Mel Gibson loses control and vents his anger by making anti-Semitic remarks, he is roundly chastised in many publications and repeatedly in the media. The latest story lasted for several weeks and still comes up on TV. Open anti-Semitism these days is taboo,  not kosher, offensive and politically incorrect.</p>
<p>       However, when journalist Helen Thomas recently opined that, “Jews should get the Hell out of Palestine,”, and “go home” to Germany and Poland, her absurd remarks got good commentary in USA Today, but very little coverage  in other major newspapers.. The vast majority of Jews in Israel are not immigrants from Germany and Poland. To suggest that they resettle in the sites of the Holocaust shows a horrible lack of sensitivity. More important,Thomas’ advice to them strongly suggests that the Jews are not entitled to a State of their own.</p>
<p>       Thomas has Lebanese roots, but these sentiments are of course shared by numerous individuals and Governments around the world. No matter what Israel does, she is in the wrong.  No matter what Hamas and Hezbollah do in attacking Israel, Israel is still in the wrong. The Arab population of Palestine is much greater than it was when Israel was formed, but Israel is still accused of displacing the rightful owners of Arab lands.  Criticism of settlements, occupation, blockades, Gaza all are really cover for the idea that Jews seeking a homeland in the Middle East (where their forefathers originated) is somehow illegitimate.  Israel is of course not free of blame, but the international attacks on her are primarily emotional and spiteful. In short, they smack more of anti-Semitism, still virulent in many European countries, than they do of carefully thought-out commentary.</p>
<p>       Racism and anti-Semitism are still alive and well in America, Europe and elsewhere, but in a new garb. Using a trite expression which has become popular these days, “You can put lipstick on a pig, but it’s still a pig.”</p>
<p>#   #   #   #   #   #   #   #   #   #   #   #</p>
<p>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://marvinrubinstein.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=188</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://marvinrubinstein.com/blog/?p=184</link>
		<comments>http://marvinrubinstein.com/blog/?p=184#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Oct 2010 03:57:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marv</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marvinrubinstein.com/blog/?p=184</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Twenty years ago, I signed up for a mortgage on my condo. I don’t remember which bank handled the loan. Ten years ago, I tried to refinance this mortgage, to a bank whose rates were much lower. Apparently,the mortgage had been sold and resold twice over the interim period. It was now in possession of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> 	Twenty years ago,  I signed up for a mortgage on my condo.  I don’t remember which bank handled the loan. Ten years ago, I tried to refinance this mortgage, to a bank whose rates were much lower. Apparently,the mortgage had been sold and resold twice over the interim period.   It was now in possession of a CitiMortgage company.</p>
<p>	Refinancing mortgages should be simple.  My attempt wasn’t.  The new bank wanted my ownership papers&#8211;my promissory note and the deed proving that I owned my condo.  Unfortunately, CitiMortgage  couldn’t find my note, my deed and other proofs of ownership.With all those transfers, the banks and mortgage companies had failed to record each linkof the legal procedures, CitiMortgage didn’t use those words.  They simply told me that they were unable to locate the documents&#8211;documents which the new lender would obviously need. I was told that I should contactthe  office of the County Clerk,which keeps copies of such records, and that they would replace my deed.  Only one problem.  There was a substantial charge for legal and and other fees they needed to expend in order to provide me with new documents. Not to mention the time and nuisance required. I dropped the whole idea. [The mortgage balance is now less than $1500,00 so, in a couple of years, when I need to retire the mortgage and want my deed back, I shall probably have the same problem.]</p>
<p>	Why am I bringing this up now?  Read your newspapers.It amuses me that many banks now trying to foreclose on delinquent mortgage holders are having problems similar to the one I had.  Before all this wheeling and dealing with mortgages, banks always kept the loan documents in their vaults.Now, with  all the transfers and slicing and dicing and consolidation going on, the ownership documents seem to have disappeared. Oops!  In one Florida county, over 1,700 notes have been “lost.” Since banks have recently carried out approximately  300,000 foreclosures a month, it is now a huge problem. For many years, these slipshod methods were routinely ignored,  but after a court ruling in 2007, everything  hit the fan . Watch out for tens of thousands of court suits during the next few years.</p>
<p>	There are some smiling property owners out there. At least for the time being. What goes around comes around.</p>
<p>				#   #   #   #   #   #   #   #   #   #</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://marvinrubinstein.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=184</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MORTGAGE BLUES</title>
		<link>http://marvinrubinstein.com/blog/?p=180</link>
		<comments>http://marvinrubinstein.com/blog/?p=180#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Oct 2010 03:51:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marv</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Observations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marvinrubinstein.com/blog/?p=180</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Twenty years ago, I signed up for a mortgage on my condo. I don’t remember which bank handled the loan. Ten years ago, I tried to refinance this mortgage, to a bank whose rates were much lower. Apparently,the mortgage had been sold and resold twice over the interim period. It was now in possession of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong> Twenty</strong> years ago,  I signed up for a mortgage on my condo.  I don’t remember which bank handled the loan. Ten years ago, I tried to refinance this mortgage, to a bank whose rates were much lower. Apparently,the mortgage had been sold and resold twice over the interim period.   It was now in possession of a CitiMortgage company.</p>
<p>       Refinancing mortgages should be simple.  My attempt wasn’t.  The new bank wanted my ownership papers&#8211;my promissory note and the deed proving that I owned my condo.  Unfortunately, CitiMortgage  couldn’t find my note, my deed and other proofs of ownership.With all those transfers, the banks and mortgage companies had failed to record each linkof the legal procedures, CitiMortgage didn’t use those words.  They simply told me that they were unable to locate the documents&#8211;documents which the new lender would obviously need. I was told that I should contactthe  office of the County Clerk,which keeps copies of such records, and that they would replace my deed.  Only one problem.  There was a substantial charge for legal and and other fees they needed to expend in order to provide me with new documents. Not to mention the time and nuisance required. I dropped the whole idea. [The mortgage balance is now less than $1500,00 so, in a couple of years, when I need to retire the mortgage and want my deed back, I shall probably have the same problem.]</p>
<p>       Why am I bringing this up now?  Read your newspapers.It amuses me that many banks now trying to foreclose on delinquent mortgage holders are having problems similar to the one I had.  Before all this wheeling and dealing with mortgages, banks always kept the loan documents in their vaults.Now, with  all the transfers and slicing and dicing and consolidation going on, the ownership documents seem to have disappeared. Oops!  In one Florida county, over 1,700 notes have been “lost.” Since banks have recently carried out approximately  300,000 foreclosures a month, it is now a huge problem. For many years, these slipshod methods were routinely ignored,  but after a court ruling in 2007, everything  hit the fan . Watch out for tens of thousands of court suits during the next few years.</p>
<p>       There are some smiling property owners out there. At least for the time being. What goes around comes around.</p>
<p>#   #   #   #   #   #   #   #   #   #</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://marvinrubinstein.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=180</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MORTGAGE BLUES</title>
		<link>http://marvinrubinstein.com/blog/?p=175</link>
		<comments>http://marvinrubinstein.com/blog/?p=175#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 03:52:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marv</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Observations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marvinrubinstein.com/blog/?p=175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Twenty years ago, I signed up for a mortgage on my condo. I don’t remember which bank handled the loan. Ten years ago, I tried to refinance this mortgage, to a bank whose rates were much lower. Apparently,the mortgage had been sold and resold twice over the interim period. It was now in possession of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twenty years ago,  I signed up for a mortgage on my condo.  I don’t remember which bank handled the loan. Ten years ago, I tried to refinance this mortgage, to a bank whose rates were much lower. Apparently,the mortgage had been sold and resold twice over the interim period.   It was now in possession of a CitiMortgage company.</p>
<p>       Refinancing mortgages should be simple.  My attempt wasn’t.  The new bank wanted my ownership papers&#8211;my promissory note and the deed proving that I owned my condo.  Unfortunately, CitiMortgage  couldn’t find my note, my deed and other proofs of ownership.With all those transfers, the banks and mortgage companies had failed to record each linkof the legal procedures, CitiMortgage didn’t use those words.  They simply told me that they were unable to locate the documents&#8211;documents which the new lender would obviously need. I was told that I should contactthe  office of the County Clerk,which keeps copies of such records, and that they would replace my deed.  Only one problem.  There was a substantial charge for legal and and other fees they needed to expend in order to provide me with new documents. Not to mention the time and nuisance required. I dropped the whole idea. [The mortgage balance is now less than $1500,00 so, in a couple of years, when I need to retire the mortgage and want my deed back, I shall probably have the same problem.]</p>
<p>       Why am I bringing this up now?  Read your newspapers.It amuses me that many banks now trying to foreclose on delinquent mortgage holders are having problems similar to the one I had.  Before all this wheeling and dealing with mortgages, banks always kept the loan documents in their vaults.Now, with  all the transfers and slicing and dicing and consolidation going on, the ownership documents seem to have disappeared. Oops!  In one Florida county, over 1,700 notes have been “lost.” Since banks have recently carried out approximately  300,000 foreclosures a month, it is now a huge problem. For many years, these slipshod methods were routinely ignored,  but after a court ruling in 2007, everything  hit the fan . Watch out for tens of thousands of court suits during the next few years.</p>
<p>       There are some smiling property owners out there. At least for the time being. What goes around comes around.</p>
<p>#   #   #   #   #   #   #   #   #   #</p>
<p>Twenty years ago,  I signed up for a mortgage on my condo.  I don’t remember which bank handled the loan. Ten years ago, I tried to refinance this mortgage, to a bank whose rates were much lower. Apparently,the mortgage had been sold and resold twice over the interim period.   It was now in possession of a CitiMortgage company.</p>
<p>Refinancing mortgages should be simple.  My attempt wasn’t.  The new bank wanted my ownership papers&#8211;my promissory note and the deed proving that I owned my condo.  Unfortunately, CitiMortgage  couldn’t find my note, my deed and other proofs of ownership.With all those transfers, the banks and mortgage companies had failed to record each linkof the legal procedures, CitiMortgage didn’t use those words.  They simply told me that they were unable to locate the documents&#8211;documents which the new lender would obviously need. I was told that I should contactthe  office of the County Clerk,which keeps copies of such records, and that they would replace my deed.  Only one problem.  There was a substantial charge for legal and and other fees they needed to expend in order to provide me with new documents. Not to mention the time and nuisance required. I dropped the whole idea. [The mortgage balance is now less than $1500,00 so, in a couple of years, when I need to retire the mortgage and want my deed back, I shall probably have the same problem.]</p>
<p>Why am I bringing this up now?  Read your newspapers.It amuses me that many banks now trying to foreclose on delinquent mortgage holders are having problems similar to the one I had.  Before all this wheeling and dealing with mortgages, banks always kept the loan documents in their vaults.Now, with  all the transfers and slicing and dicing and consolidation going on, the ownership documents seem to have disappeared. Oops!  In one Florida county, over 1,700 notes have been “lost.” Since banks have recently carried out approximately  300,000 foreclosures a month, it is now a huge problem. For many years, these slipshod methods were routinely ignored,  but after a court ruling in 2007, everything  hit the fan . Watch out for tens of thousands of court suits during the next few years.</p>
<p>There are some smiling property owners out there. At least for the time being. What goes around comes around.</p>
<p>#   #   #   #   #   #   #   #   #   #</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://marvinrubinstein.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=175</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A SALUTE TO NORTH CAROLINA</title>
		<link>http://marvinrubinstein.com/blog/?p=173</link>
		<comments>http://marvinrubinstein.com/blog/?p=173#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 23:21:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marv</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Observations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marvinrubinstein.com/blog/?p=173</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Perhaps this piece should be called “A Salute to Changing times.”Chie and I recently visited frinds in Maryland and North Carolina, states which I had not been to for many years.My memory of Baltimore was a group of identical row house, where I would never live for fear of trying to find my way home [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Perhaps</strong> this piece should be called “A Salute to Changing times.”Chie and I recently visited frinds in Maryland and North Carolina, states which I had not been to for many years.My memory of Baltimore was a group of identical row house, where I would never live for fear of trying to find my way  home drunk some night.The city has vastly improved with an attractive city center and lovely scenic suburban areas, not to mention Charleston, a really great retaurant.</p>
<p>      The Raleigh Durham are in North Carolina was even more of a pleasant surprise.  The daughter of our friend had recently enrolled in the University of North Carolina in Chapel Hill. This gave us an excuse for wandering around the campus. Perhaps I should not have been surprised, since I read newspapers and listen to newscasts, but seeing is believing.  I was pleased and proud to see white and African-American students strolling around the campus in friendly and happy groups. That’s the sway it should be, but I am old enough to remember Governors standing in doorways of southern colleges, threatening to block admission of Black children.<br />
Progress in racial relations is always welcome.</p>
<p>      Icing on the cake.  We stayed at the home of our friend in an attractive area of newly built middle class houses.  Lo and behold, her next-door neighbor was an interracial couple&#8211;a black husband and a white wife. True, North Carolina is not the deep South, but . . . Ain’t progress wonderful?</p>
<p>#   #   #   #   #   #   #   #   #   #</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://marvinrubinstein.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=173</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://marvinrubinstein.com/blog/?p=168</link>
		<comments>http://marvinrubinstein.com/blog/?p=168#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 23:20:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marv</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marvinrubinstein.com/blog/?p=168</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Salute]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Salute</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://marvinrubinstein.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=168</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>THE REPUBLICAN&#8217;S CARDINAL SIN</title>
		<link>http://marvinrubinstein.com/blog/?p=164</link>
		<comments>http://marvinrubinstein.com/blog/?p=164#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 03:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marv</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marvinrubinstein.com/blog/?p=164</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a traditional liberal, I have many differences with Republican policies. However, one outstanding one sticks out like a sore thumb and has had a devastating effect on our Country’s progress. That policy, that sin, is to make taxation a dirty word. For more years than I care to remember, Republicans have been harping on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>As a</strong> traditional liberal, I have many differences with Republican policies.  However, one outstanding one sticks out like a sore thumb and has had a devastating effect on our Country’s progress.  That policy, that sin, is to make taxation a dirty word.</p>
<p>For more years than I care to remember, Republicans have been harping on the claim that Americans are overtaxed.  They use this as a club against the Democrats, claiming over and over that the Democrats are the “tax and spend” party, this despite the fact that the Republicans, under Bush, have spent more of the public’s money than any previous administration.</p>
<p>The Republicans have done more than just complaining about taxation; they have created an image of taxation as an evil practice.  Unfortunately, many members of the public have accepted this erroneous concept.</p>
<p>By making taxes a dirty word, the Republicans have made it impossible for our government to raise money for necessary expenditures and, have consequently forced the government to borrow, borrow, borrow money from foreign countries (particularly China and Japan) to cover these expenses.  This has not only vastly increased our national debt, it has put us at the mercy of other governments who are not necessarily friendly to our aims.</p>
<p>Taxes are necessary to finance our military machine, our police forces, our schools, our fire departments, our federal departments who protect the safety of our food supplies.  Many other areas are starved for necessary financing.  As a result, our military machine is in sad shape; our schools are deteriorating and we have had periodic reports of lives lost due to food contamination.</p>
<p>We also need taxes to keep our roads, bridges, water supplies and sewage systems in good repair.  Because we have not raised sufficient money to keep up the quality of our infrastructure, substantial deterioration has taken place and we have been forced to apply bandaids where extensive replacements and renovation are required.  As a consequence, for example, we have had bridges collapse with resulting loss of life.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, the Democratic opposition has been frightened by the possibility of losing elections if they press for proper financing to keep out country on the right path.  With the Republicans constantly pressing for tax relief (particularly for the rich) and with the Democrats retreating out of political cowardice, the country is sinking deeper and deeper into a financial hole.</p>
<p>We are not overtaxed.  This is particularly true of the wealthy segment of our population who are given special benefits and who are allowed to take advantage of huge loopholes in the tax laws.</p>
<p>Republicans may scoff, but paying necessary taxes is essentially a patriotic duty.</p>
<p>                                                            # # # # # # # # # # # #</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://marvinrubinstein.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=164</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. GOVERNMENT: “DON’T GO NEAR THE WATER”</title>
		<link>http://marvinrubinstein.com/blog/?p=159</link>
		<comments>http://marvinrubinstein.com/blog/?p=159#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2010 05:04:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marv</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marvinrubinstein.com/blog/?p=159</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[  The U.S. State Department has issued a warning to Americans contemplating a visit to Europe. “In light of the increased concern about the potential for terrorist (Al Qaeda) attacks,” exercise caution, avoid crowds, be careful, be very careful. The warning statement covered a large geographic area, but was scant on specifics. We offer clarification: [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> </p>
<p><strong>The</strong> U.S. State Department has issued a warning to Americans contemplating a visit to Europe.  “In light of the increased concern about the potential for terrorist (Al Qaeda) attacks,” exercise caution, avoid crowds, be careful, be very careful.  The warning statement covered a large geographic area,  but was scant on specifics. We offer clarification:</p>
<p>Bon voyage to Paris, but don’t go near the Eiffel Tower, the Champs Elysee, the Etoile, the Opera and the Louvre. And ladies, the crowds in  Galeries Lafayette and Printemps are murder.</p>
<p>Be sure to cross the channel to London, but be very cautious about visiting Trafalgar Square, Piccadilly Circus and Kensington Palace, particularly at Changing of the Guard time.Want to avoid crowds, a real temptation for terrorists, stay away from Harrods. And incidentally, the Underground is a favorite bombing target.To be absolutely secure, it might be a good idea to avoid London altogether.  A nice motor tour around the Cotswolds is extremely pleasant–– and relatively safe.</p>
<p>Rome is lovely at this time of year.  There are always crowds around the Trevi Fountain,  so tossing a coin into the fountain may accompany your last wish. The Spanish Steps is another great gathering place.  And don’t think that the Vatican is safe holy ground. Since terrorists blow up Mosques and Synagogues, don’t for a moment think that fear of Allah makes the Vatican sacrosanct.</p>
<p>So, what about Germany? You’ve heard that Berlin is not safe, so you might want to try Cologne or Dusseldorf. Cologne has many beautiful cathedrals. The best known and most frequently visited by tourists is the Dom, if you don’t mind crowds. One should never visit this city without hoisting a stein of beer at one or more of its famous brauhauses.  Trying to find a small, uncrowded one, however, is not easy.  Ladies like to visit Dusseldorf to wander around Konigsalle, one of the most spectacular high fashion shopping streets in Europe.  Unfortunately, it is also one of the most crowded.  You pays your money, and you takes your chances.</p>
<p>Fellow American travellers, the Government’s warning  can be summed up with an old folk song from the Ozarks:<br />
“Mother, may I go out to swim?<br />
Yes, my darling daughter,<br />
Hang your clothes on a hickory limb,<br />
But don’t go near the water.”</p>
<p>#   #   #   #   #   #   #   #   #</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://marvinrubinstein.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=159</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

